Re: *pu:tium prae-pu:tium sala-pu:tium

----- Original Message -----

From: alexandru_mg3

To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 12:18 PM

Subject: [Courrier indésirable] Re: [tied] *pu:tium prae-pu:tium sala-pu:tium

--- In cybalist@... s.com, "fournet.arnaud"
> 1.a *pu:tium could be a simple -yo- compound formed LONG BEFORE a
> construction with prae- has appeared:
>
> He have plenty of such example in Latin like:
> Latin o:stium < Latin o:s 'mouth' < PIE *h3oh1-s-o
> Latin pretium < PIE *pre-t-yo-
>
> Marius
> ==========
> (tsalam? t?ob)
> I don't think these examples are a refutation of Assertion 2.
>
> Latin pretius is verb with *e > noun derivative : pre > pre-t-yo
> I see no reason why o:stium could not be the same *h3eh1-s-t-yo
(with -e-)
> (I keep this root H3_H1, although I am sceptical it could exist)

Honestly I don't understand what is the link between 'a preposition'
and the /e/ that you try to show me . Please could you be more
specific?

=========

Cher Marius,

It seems your English is even more appalling than mine.

J'ai écrit :  "Latin pretius is verb with e > noun derivative".

Verb : pre hence noun pret-yo.

Je ne parle pas de préposition.

Ta question est débile...

Arnaud

===================

1. There are no "prepositions" in o:stium and pretium

==========

Obviously so.

Cette assertion est inutile et hors-sujet.

===============

2. pre- in pre-t-yo is not a preposition we have quite the PIE
root /to sell, to trafficate/ inside => /porno/ (to still remain in
the current topic) belongs there too.

==============

Wrong.

The verb pernu:mi has :

aorist pera-sai

perfect peprâ-mai

Root is p_r_H2 not -H1.

Erreur grossière.

Arnaud

=================

2. There is no /e/ BUT /o/ in Latin o:s ;mouth' < *h3oh1-s- and I
confirm you that the root for the 'mouth' is *h3oh1- with /o/ not
with /e/ : please see the related cognates of the 'mouth' word
especially the Skt. and the Hitt. forms)
Marius

=========

What are these forms ?

Arnaud

=============