On this list, a well-known feminist, who blames men for the world's woes in
her writings, accused me of _misogyny_ because I questioned whether
archaeological evidence for the female invention of agriculture
exists.
In connection with this question, Torsten quoted Hechelheim as believing
that such evidence did exist.
I belong to another discussion list composed of anthropologists, who are
constantly evaluating archaeological evidence for early human behavior and
genetic composition.
I asked the question neutrally, and assured the list that I only wanted
opinions - that I would not argue for either side.
The answer I received is that there is _no_ archaeological evidence for the
female invention of agriculture and hardly any, among very early human
occupations for agriculture or gardening at all.
If men were primarily hunters, and women pursued non-violent agriculture,
the feminist argument for female equality, and particularly non-violent
behavior, is obviously supported.
I am not a misogynist, and I resent mightily being accused of so being on
the basis of a remark which, among experts, is the last word.
Although this has only a tangential effect on language, I claim the right
to answer personal slurs with factual remarks.
Patrick