From: Francesco Brighenti
Message: 51837
Date: 2008-01-23
>Kishore
>
>
>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "kishore patnaik"
> <kishorepatnaik09@> wrote:
>
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Francesco Brighenti"
> > <frabrig@> wrote:
> >
> > > Here are some among the "scholarly sources" hinted at by
> > > when he refers to "archaeological proofs" of ancient Indian-Mayan
> > > connections:published
> > >
> > > http://www.hinduismtoday.com/archives/1995/11/1995-11-08.shtml
> > >
> > > http://www.hinduismtoday.com/archives/1995/6/1995-6-01.shtml
> > >
> > > Both articles are taken from Hinduism Today, a Hawaii-based
> > > Hindutva (= Hindu nationalist) magazine which is also
> > > online.
> >
> > KP: I have seen only one article (ie "My Turn") and not the
> > other. Would you like to condemn these articles?
>
>
> I have found the whole damn "Indian-Amerindian" thang at last.
> That's astounding! Spent some hours in reading all those articles
> and opening the links to their sources (represented by older
> articles and books, some of which can be accessed online through
> those links). The funny historical, archaeological, artistic and
> etymological arguments made by the authors of this compilation can
> be easily debunked one by one, but this linguistic big enterprise.
> Moreover, the latter would take a lot of time and efforts!
>
> Here's the link (N.B. The page is part of a well-known Hindutva
> website):
>
> http://www.hinduwisdom.info/Pacific.htm
>
> Have a nice reading... :^)
>
> Cheers,
> Francesco
>