--- In
cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "kishore patnaik"
<kishorepatnaik09@...> wrote:
>
> Dear Ualarauans,
>
> I really cant get you. Did I ever say that I am trying to prove
my hypothesis on the basis of language?
No, you didn't say that. You said that "[t]he sanskrit influences on
Mayans are beyond doubt" adding that "they [sc. Mayans] followed
their own languages and their own traditions".
[
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/51454%5d
This is really something I can't get. Doesn't the term "Sanskrit"
refer to the LANGUAGE? Now, if you state that the influences of the
Sanskrit language on Mayans are beyond doubt, you must have some
good arguments of purely linguistic nature to support this thesis.
At least I believed so. I asked you to share this knowledge with the
group. And now I am answered that the person who claimed to have
made the greatest linguistic discovery since Prof. Hrozny is in fact
not a linguist (but that doesn't matter) and isn't even "trying to
prove his hypothesis on the basis of language" (sic!!!). I am lost.
> If you read some of my recent messages, unconnected with Mayans,
you will note that I am not a linguist.
And you think that this fact per se authorizes you to make claims
that "Lithuanians are from India", "Etruscans are from India" and
even "Indus people are from India" (which may be not so surprizing
but in this context stinks nevertheless)?
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/51301
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/51275
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/51344
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/51138
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/51123
> sorry if you feel cheated,
Yes, I do. Sorry for being so naive.