Re: Foxtail

On 2008-01-22 04:38, stlatos wrote:

> Mainly, why not *puksk^o+ > *pukk^o+ > ? first since, despite your
> questions about it in Gmc., a very sim. rule is known in Indic. If
> you think all KsK > sK first, I disagree, though I'm willing to ask:
> do you have any more examples?

*pr.k^-sk^e/o- > Skt. pr.ccHati is an obvious example.

Piotr