From: Patrick Ryan
Message: 51713
Date: 2008-01-21
----- Original Message -----From: Piotr GasiorowskiSent: Monday, January 21, 2008 8:07 AMSubject: Re: [tied] fickenOn 2008-01-21 14:35, alexandru_mg3 wrote:
> Rom. puT& /puc&/ 'small penis' < Rom-Subtr. *putsa: < PIE *puk^-e-h2
>
> Marius
>
> P.S. No need for "the invented" Latin-form *pu:tium
Is it invented? It could easily have been abstracted from
<prae-pu:tium> . It's already there, so there's no need to invoke a
substratal word. It would only make sense if you had some damn good
independent evidence that such *puk^ah2 really existed.
Piotr