From: Francesco Brighenti
Message: 51438
Date: 2008-01-19
> On 2008-01-17 16:47, kishore patnaik wrote:A more recent etymological hypothesis states that 'Maya' is derived
>
> > The most significant part of it is there was a famous Daitya
> > called Maya, who was a famous architect and engineer being
> > present at the time of MBh, who left India for far off places.
> > The traditional dating of MBh tallies with the Mayan dating.
> > You can't simply dismiss so much similarity between a
> > historical (and architecturally known civilization) and so
> > called Mythological legends as merely coincidental.
>
> We can, since the ancient Mayan peoples did not call
> themselves "Maya". Their linguistic cousins and descendants have
> started doing so recently, presumably to promote the unity of
> indigenous Guatemalans and Mexicans speaking different but related
> languages (related to each other, but certainly not to
> Sanskrit :)). Maya(b)' T'an (literaly, 'the speech of flat lands')
> is the native name of Yucatec, just one of the Mayan languages,
> applied by the Spaniards (and then everybody else) to a group
> of linguistically related peoples.