I agree :
some times you learn more about the
author.
What about :
Arabic &aqrub
Greek skorpion
***
What about it? ?aqrub is simply a noun form (?aCCuC) of the root
q-r-b.
PCR
***
I agree even more
most of the time you learn more about the
author.
Root q_r_b is the same as in (s-)k_r_p
the p in scorpion is another example of correspondance
with -b-.
That was what I meant.
Arnaud
===============
Arabic [?] "glottal stop" is one of the form of
H2.
And so are most glottalized emphatics of
Semitic
excepted p? > PIE *b and t? fused with d
> PIE *d
And k? fused with *g.
?ans "a man" = H2ner
Etc
Those who think H1 is [?] would better change
their minds
as soon as possible.
They are on the wrong track.
Arnaud
***
There is no *H1, *H2, *H3 (nor *H4), IMHO.
===========
I don't understand this statement
Quite obviously most IE languages keep traces of at least three
different classes of phonemes, that have had different impacts on their
surroundings :
length, voice, color, tone, etc.
==================
The language from which PIE developed had four
laryngeal/pharyngea ls: /?/, /h/,
/¿/, and /h./;
============
It had at least these.
And some others.
"Laryngeals" is a misleading word
Not all disappeared phonemes are "laryngeal"
they are functionally "laryngeal" but phonetically
they are not "laryngeal".
Arnaud
========================
and three vowels: /e/, /a/, /o/.
=====
Arnaud
Obviously wrong.
[a] is just allophonic of /e/.
or vice-versa.
==============
/?/ and /h/ and /h./ become PIE *H which lengthens the vowel,
subsequently maintaining its quality. *e:, *a:, and *o: can subsequently be
shortened.
/¿/ becomes *y but occasionally *ø with vowel lengthening.
Initial *ø becomes /?/ in the Germanic branch of IE.
Conventionally written *H2ner- derived from earlier **hano-r(o),
'strong' (Egyptian nr, 'fear inspiring').
Patrick
***
==========
This is non sense
Not a word of it is worth considering
Arnaud
=============
