From: fournet.arnaud
Message: 51281
Date: 2008-01-15
----- Original Message -----
From: "Piotr Gasiorowski" <gpiotr@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 6:19 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] Brugmann's Law
> On 2008-01-15 17:29, Mate Kapović wrote:
>
>> A question on Brugmann's Law. It is widely known that sometimes there is
>> no Brugmann's Law in Sanskrit when we would expect it and this has to be
>> explained in various reasons.
>> Mayrhofer's solution is that Brugmann operates only in front of *m/n/l/r
>> but I find that impossible since we have forms like acc. pá:dam, nom. pl.
>> pá:das, nom. pl. gá:vas etc.
=========
What is the vowel in Pok 700 manu / monu "man" ?
I suppose it has already be discussed !?
Arnaud
==============