Re: [SPAM]Re: [tied] Etruscans

From: P&G
Message: 51157
Date: 2008-01-10

I thoroughly agree.
Beekes does not seem to engage properly with the problems.
 
Peter
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: fournet.arnaud
To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 6:45 PM
Subject: [SPAM]Re: [tied] Etruscans

I think I read this paper.
I am unconvinced.
I am afraid Beekes wrote something he should have avoided.
 
Arnaud
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] Etruscans

I have a paper by R. S. P. Beekes, ``The Origin of the Etruscans'' that proposes the Lydian origin. It is dated 2003.

Beekes is hardly your next-door crackpot...

"fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@ wanadoo.fr> escreveu:

Archeologists agree on the fact that the place where
Etruscans can be found historically is continuously
occupied by an archeological culture
that is traceable at least to - 1 700,
with no clear trace of outside intrusion.
If Etruscans should ever be from somewhere else,
they must have arrived very earlier.
I suppose most (pre)historians working on Etruscans
are just fed up with crack-pot theories.
And it is the reason why a majority of people just think
Etruscans are autochotonous in Italia.
I don't see any place where Etruscans could come from
in the "East".
This would imply Etruscan is clearly connected with some other language
in the east : so which one ?
 
Arnaud
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: P&G
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 9:23 AM
Subject: Re: [SPAM][tied] Etruscans

>Can some one clarify to me the connection between Etruscan with the
>East in simple terms?

In simple terms, the answer is no.
There are always theories, some odder than others, but no consensus.

Peter

Abra sua conta no Yahoo! Mail, o único sem limite de espaço para armazenamento!