Re: Final voicing (3)

From: afyangh
Message: 51082
Date: 2008-01-02

> > > > *-(o)-mV(s)-(dG)-ai
> > > > *-(o)-dGw-oi
> > > I don't understand what these forms stand for
> > > especially -dGw- ??
> >
> > The idea is that, in some languages at least, dG > dH
>
> It does, but as seen in *dGaxY+ / *dGay+ 'divide' not in those which
> would allow the above derivation to work.
======
Arnaud
I suppose "some languages" allowing dG > dH amounts to only sanscrit !?

Arnaud