From: Andrew Jarrette
Message: 51066
Date: 2008-01-01
<handuz> is from this same *k'omt-?> > Hence from k-m?
> > Arabic x-m-s (x = velar unvoiced spirant)
> > Uralic kom-t, kum-en, hand, five, ten
> > PIE pen-kwe : entire hand = five
> > And as usual !!
> > Germanic loanword from an Asiatic language : komt > hand
> > And *hant-i being a "root-noun" does not protect it from being a
> > loanword.
>Does this mean that <dek'mt> "ten" is from *d(w)e-k'(o)mt "two hands, two fives, ten"? And Gmc