From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 50840
Date: 2007-12-10
> You said Gamajun looked Indo-Iranian. If from anything there, itBut I only said I wondered whether it wasn't IIr., and the inference
> must be from Garutma:n or a slightly dif. form depending on which
> language it came from. That strains credibility much more.
> I don'tWell, since it was taken from Mediaeval Greek, the source was /finiks/,
> think Gdan'sk causes any more difficulties than, say, *Foiniks > Finist.
> Depending on the timing, maybe just:*-andi:z, more likely (Goth. andeis < *anDijaz), but it may not matter
>
> *gutiskandjaz
> *gUtIskandjU ... basic Sl-formatingIn an early loan you would have *dj > *dz. Later, there always was a
> *gUtIskand'U ... dj > d'
> *gUtIskan'U .... no d' in Sl (all dj>dz^ earlier)
> *gUtan'IskU .... met. to put pal. C before IBut voicing assimilation is invariably regressive in such new clusters,
> *gtan'sk ....... weak yer > 0
> *gdan'sk ....... C > +voice after C+v in syl.
> That's only one case of met., to get n'I not n'U,'U > 'I was an automatic adjustment rule in Slavic. You get it
> which is aFinally, there's no evidence that "Gothiskandza" was ever used as the
> reasonable thing to want at the time. Every other change is adapting
> a foreign word to Sl phonetics and phonotactics.