--- In
cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Ryan" <proto-language@...>
wrote:
>
> Richard:
>
> Thank you for the information.
>
> But no one has reconstructed them for Sino-Tibetan, right?
There's no certainly sign of them in Matisoff's 'Handbook of
Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and Philosophy of Sino-Tibetan
Reconstruction' (accessible via
http://repositories.cdlib.org/ucpress/ucpl/vol_135/ ), though some
languages have acquired them. Incidentally, its Appendix A seems a
good reference for reconciling reconstructions of Chinese phonology.
> What do you think?
I'll take advice from the expert phoneticists here, but [bH] might not
be an unreasonable representation of a stage in which the voicing of
stops is being transferred to breathiness of the following vowel, as
happened in most of mainland East Asia. The stop usually ends up as
[p], but in some langauges it ends up as [pH].
Richard.