From: alexandru_mg3
Message: 50315
Date: 2007-10-17
>on
> On 2007-10-16 23:14, alexandru_mg3 wrote:
>
> > Because the c^ of Romanian /k&c^ul&/ 'hat' cannot be originated
> > the s of MLat casula , /k&c^ul&/ cannot be 'derived' from MLatcasula
> > only the invers relation could be true...Yes, it's quite Ok. If you continue like this, you could be published
> >
> > But maybe your point was related only to MLat <casula>?
>
> What I suggested was that the Med.Lat. word could be a loan from
> something like Albanian, with *c^ already changed into a fricative,
> while the Romanian word would reflect the original Proto-Albanian
> pronunciation. I hope you like it this way.
>