[tied] Re: Renfrew's theory renamed as Vasco-Caucasian

From: urba_kestutis
Message: 50182
Date: 2007-09-30

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Rick McCallister <gabaroo6958@...>
wrote:
>
> Then he changed his mind from what I remember him
> saying a few years back. No shame in that.
>
>
> --- "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
> wrote:
>
> > Saami, supposedly has 25% pre-Uralic substrate and I
> > have no clue about any substrate in Finnish.
> > I've always wondered about shared substrate among
> > Germanic, Saami, Balto-Finnic and Baltic --but none
> > of
> > you will get up off your duffs and figure it out for
> > me.
> > ===============
> > A.F
> > If you read Ante Aikio's works,
> > you will notice that he rejects the word
> > "autochtonous" and "substrate"
> > See
> >
> http://www.ling.helsinki.fi/sky/julkaisut/SKY2005/Aikio.pdf
> >
> > page 10.
> >
> > Also :
> > http://www.oulu.fi/nak22/absu2.html
> >
> > Ante Aikio, University of Oulu, Giellagas Institute
> >
> > The origin of Saami: a critical look at
> > archaeological and linguistic evidence
> > The paper provides a critical review of the
> > suggested connections between various archaeological
> > cultures and the Saami language. In addition, recent
> > results in comparative linguistics are summarized.
> > It is shown that the loanword strata in the Saami
> > languages are inconsistent with an assumption of a
> > long Saami ethnic continuity in Lapland. The
> > evidence suggests that the Proto-Saami language and
> > Saami ethnic identity first emerged at a more
> > southern latitude and spread to its present
> > territory only in the early Iron Age. Consequently,
> > any archaeological culture in Lapland prior to the
> > Iron Age is best characterized as non-Saami.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: fournet.arnaud
> > To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 6:22 PM
> > Subject: Re: [tied] Re: Renfrew's theory renamed
> > as Vasco-Caucasian
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Rick McCallister
> > To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 7:22 AM
> > Subject: Re: [tied] Re: Renfrew's theory renamed
> > as Vasco-Caucasian
> >
> >
> > So when do you think the Saami began speaking
> > Uralic
> >
> > ==============
> >
> > A.F
> >
> > What do you mean ?
> >
> > Saami people are obviously Uralic, and never
> > spoke anything but Uralic.
> >
> > Saami is definitely conservative, in the Uralic
> > family.
> >
> > ===================
> >
> >
> > and the Finns moved into Finland?
> >
> > =================
> >
> > A.F
> >
> > They moved into Eastern Europe,
> >
> > After Germanic split into Westic and Nordic,
> >
> > and after Iranian split from Indic.
> >
> > So it must be rather late,
> >
> > A rough guess : after - 2 000 BC.
> >
> > ====================

>
ARCHAEOLOGICAL INFORMATION

FinoUgric people moved from Uralic to Baltic sea into northern Kunda
Narva archaeological culture area (Estonia, part of Latvia)
aproximately at 3000BC *I\m not sure exactly - but trying to search
my memory* becouse of climate change - very cold weather at Uralic,
and mild at Baltic becouse of GulfStream

They brought so called combed pottery which existed together with
Baltic pottery and left some finish places names even in Lithuania

Proffessor me told that the most ancient Finnish vocabulary layer
is ...Baltic or preBaltic

every 11 from 1000 finnish words are related to Baltic

some hunting and nature but most of agriculture

for example ship in Lithuanian is laivas and in finnish hlaiva

ax in Lithuania is kirvis and finnish kirves...and so on


Kestutis