From: fournet.arnaud
Message: 50144
Date: 2007-09-30
----- Original Message -----From: Patrick RyanSent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 10:42 PMSubject: [Courrier indsirable] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [tied] Renfrew's theory renamed as Vasco-Caucasian
***Reading your present or past mail is pointless. You never address the challenge I made.I can only conclude that you have some kind of reading comprehension problem.I am commenting on your illogicalities not for your benefit, since you seem incapable of learning, but for the benefit of anyone else who might be reading your posts, and mistakenly think there is any validity to what you write.Patrick Ryan***----- Original Message -----From: fournet.arnaudSent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 3:06 PMSubject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [tied] Renfrew's theory renamed as Vasco-Caucasian
Read my previous mailonce more.Arnaud----- Original Message -----From: Patrick RyanSent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 8:57 PMSubject: [Courrier indsirable] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [tied] Renfrew's theory renamed as Vasco-Caucasian
----- Original Message -----From: fournet.arnaudSent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 11:36 AMSubject: Fw: Re: Re: Re: Re: [tied] Renfrew's theory renamed as Vasco-Caucasian
<snip>Long i: versus zeroki:ku-s strengthshvayati to be strong*ku- > shv as in kuHon "dog"There is no reason to reject *i and *u as vowels.***You yourself have provided the reason for rejecting *i and *u as vowels:your failure to furnish 5 VERBAL roots of the form *CiC, or5 VERBAL roots of the form *CuC.If *i and *u are *V, then providing VERBAL roots of the form *CVC with *i and *u should be no problem.Patrick Ryan***<snip>.