Re: Re[6]: [tied] Re: Renfrew's theory renamed as Vasco-Caucasian

From: Rick McCallister
Message: 50009
Date: 2007-09-21

For many of the Celtic items, you cuold be right BUT he absolutely refused to even consider the possibility that other pre-Roman IE languages could have influeced Basque
but there words that seems to correspond to non-Latin and non-Celtic

"Brian M. Scott" <BMScott@...> wrote:
At 3:49:01 AM on Thursday, September 20, 2007, Rick
McCallister wrote:

> Even though Trask pointed out that much of Basque toponymy
> is of Celtic origin and possibly even the word Basque, he
> only considered about 5 or 10 Basque words to be of Celtic
> origin and refused to consider any other possible
> pre-Roman IE languages that were known to be in the area
> such as Lusitanian and Ligurian

How do you distinguish 'refused to consider' from 'gave due
consideration to and dismissed'?

Brian



Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell.


Previous in thread: 50008
Next in thread: 50010
Previous message: 50008
Next message: 50010

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts