Re: RE : [tied] Re: North of the Somme

At 1:14:59 AM on Wednesday, September 5, 2007, tgpedersen
wrote:

[...]

>> Or you could simply read the following, from 'earlier
>> occurrences of this neverending thread', especially the
>> starred posts:

>> <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/20220>
>> <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/20518>
>> <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/29057>
>> <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/29059>
>> <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/29111>*
>> <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/29115>*
>> <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/29166>*
>> <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/29207>

> I've read them before and have nothing to add.

Fine. As far as I'm concerned, you've now confirmed that
you are so much in love with your own hypotheses that you
will invent absurdly non-parsimonious stories to avoid the
plain implications of the actual evidence. This makes
further discussion pointless (and in my opinion puts you at
least into the fringes of crank territory).

Brian