Re: RE : [tied] Re: North of the Somme

On 2007-09-04 22:30, tgpedersen wrote:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...> wrote:
>> On 2007-09-03 20:38, squilluncus wrote:
>>
>>> However, Göt- (from Gaut-) and Got- (the th in the end is a later
>>> decoration) are in no way lauthistorisch compatible.
>> But they could well be related as containing different apophonic
>> grades of the same root *g^Heud-: *g^Houd-o- > *Gauta- and
>> *g^Hud-(on-) > *Gut-(an-), respectively.
>
> Aren't you forgetting Verner here?

No, I'm not. VL doesn't apply here.

Piotr