From: tgpedersen
Message: 49754
Date: 2007-09-01
>That can't be true. There are some rather heavy NW-SE dialect lines in
> I would question the lack of dialectal continuity
> between Scandinavian & Western --that's true now but
> Scandinavian overran Jutland c. 400 and eliminated any
> transitional dialects.
> I understand that while Lowhttp://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/28035
> Saxon was definitely Western, Anglian may have had
> some transitional traits and we don't know anything
> about Jutish or Geatish, etc.
> And, as Brian says, Eastern split much eariler.One title of the Danish kings until 1972 was 'de venders og goters',
> My question regarding Eastern is whether it split from
> the N end of what was a dialect chain.
> There is anecdotal evidence such as "Goth" names in
> Sweden, the Old Swedish Royal Title "KIng of the
> Swedes, the Goths and the Vandals" that suggest it
> split from Scandinavia and crossed the Baltic.
> Superficially,N German does look closer to E GermanicWhich Celtic substrate are you referring to?
> but I'm guessing because it didn't share in the same
> innovations as W Germanic and didn't riun into a
> Celtic substrate
> What timeframe are we looking at?How about
> c. 600 BC for E Germanic?
> c. 200 BC for N Germanic?
> c. 400 AD for split-up of W Germanic languages?