> And to suppose "Germanic" requires to identify
> which
"Germanic" language is involved (ter
> repetitas) ?
****GK: Were
there already clearly distinct Germanic
languages in 58 BC?
=============
A.F
Proto-Germanic is a branch of PIE languages
that
separated from PIE
at the least of the least 4000 years before -58
BC
(And most probably at least 8000 years before -58 BC)
I can't believe it remained unchanged until -58
BC
until we suddenly discover that Saxon, Frankish,
Norse,
Gothic are different around + 400.
We have to try to know what kind of Germanic
language(s)
is involved.
I disagree with this method that consists of creating
catch-all words such as "Gauls", "Belgians",
"Germanic"
that are fuzzy and uncontrollable
that in the end describe about nothing
that allow all kinds of unfalsifiable
theories,
that overlook available data .
etc
This is not science.