From: Brian M. Scott
Message: 49214
Date: 2007-06-30
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Joao S. Lopes"This is obvious nonsense: <pishyakan> is impossible in
> <josimo70@...> wrote:
>> They are mainly onomatopoeic. Not sure as PIE roots. And
>> if there was a PIE root for "cat", it would refer to the
>> wild cat, not the domestic one, that came to Europe
>> through North Africa (Latin cattus<North African).
> Onomatopoeic yes, but old too...
> Why you make reference only to Latin here, talking about PIE?
> Gaelic : pishyakan