Re: [tied] Re: Dnghu.org and "Modern" Indo-European

Can you explain your ideas on Illyrian?
Was it closely related to Dacian &/or Thracian?
Or is enough known to tell?
Do you see Dacian and Thracian as very close or not?
What is the consensus on Macedonian? Closer to Greek?
or to Illyrian? or Thracian/Dacian?


--- Abdullah Konushevci <akonushevci@...> wrote:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "C. Darwin
> Goranson"
> <cdog_squirrel@...> wrote:
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Andrew Jarrette
> <anjarrette@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I went to the Europaio website and there they
> have a description of
> > how to produce the voiced aspirated stops. There
> are ways to
> > distinguish voiced breathiness from vowels, as
> described in the methods
> > to produce voiced aspirates on this website, but
> the descriptions
> > offered are highly technical, difficult to follow,
> and suggest
> > vocalizations that are very difficult for
> Europeans to produce, who are
> > unaccustomed to the production of such sounds.
> > >
> > > But anyway, how did you find out about
> Dnghu.org?
> >
> > Complete chance, in fact - I was looking up stuf
> on Indo-European on
> > Google, then POP! Up came Dnghu!
> ************
> Interesting, no one is discussing the updated
> Pokorny's Dictionary,
> where some of my ideas, especially about the
> hardening of laryngeals
> and outcomes of laryngeals in Albanian are accepted
> thoroughly, leave
> aside Albanian affiliation from Illyrian and
> phonetic mutation -gW- >
> -b-, -kW- > -p-.
>
> Konushevci
>
>
>

____________________________________________________________________________________
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC