[tied] Re: *-tro-/*-tlo-

From: tgpedersen
Message: 49129
Date: 2007-06-23

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "stlatos" <stlatos@...> wrote:
>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > - For ukthá-, there is also the possible model of *wr.thó-,
> > > continued in Lat. verbum and OE word from underlying *wr.H1-tó-,
> > > the ptc. of the verbal root *werH1- seen in Gk. eíro: 'speak',
> > > rhé:to:r 'speaker'.
> > > This is of course mere guesswork, not any kind of proof.
> >
> > I thought verbum, word would point to *wr.-dhó- ??
>
> They do, or in my theory *v(e)rdhóm, but with the theory that
> h()t>tH was PIE it becomes a possibility.

What on earth does that mean?


> I think someone speculated about tH>d in Balto-Slavic, too, but I
> really don't believe it.

And -dh- comes in where?


Torsten