From: Rick McCallister
Message: 48920
Date: 2007-06-08
> At 9:40:40 PM on Thursday, June 7, 2007, Rick____________________________________________________________________________________
> McCallister wrote:
>
> > In the US, the pronunciation is definitely /or/
> and
> > not /Or/.
>
> This is meaningless until you explain what words you
> think
> contain phonemes /o/ and /O/. In the Fromkin &
> Rodman
> system, which is widely used for AmE, /O/ is the
> vowel of
> <or> and <more>, and /o/ is the vowel of <so> and
> <code>.
> In terms of phones rather than phonemes, the usual
> rhotic
> U.S. pronunciation of <or> is definitely [Or], not
> [or].
>
> > I have never heard anyone in the last 40 years or
> so
> > distinguish pore and poor anywhere in the US.
>
> And outside the south I have rarely heard anyone
> *not*
> distinguish them in that time. (I'm 59.)
>
> > In the Midwest, where I grew up pore and poor are
> > pronounced the same,
>
> The Midwest is a big place; I have no doubt that
> parts of it
> had the poor-pore merger when you were growing up.
> Other
> parts didn't.
>
> > also in the NW and SW (where I lived many years)
> and in
> > the Mid-Atlantic where I live now.
>
> I was born in the Pacific Northwest, and both of my
> parents
> were from there; I was quite startled the first time
> I heard
> someone pronounce <poor> as if it were spelled
> <pore>.
>
> Brian
>
>
>