From: Sean Whalen
Message: 48704
Date: 2007-05-23
> On 2007-05-23 03:26, Sean Whalen wrote:This is followed by u; it only happens in two
>
> > For this I did give a possible mot. (that rsn is
> a
> > long uncommon chain of dentals). A dissimilation
> of
> > rsn > rsm would seem fine to me; since it's
> followed
> > by u there is a switch instead of straight
> > dissimilation.
>
> *-rsn- is not particularly uncommon in PIE:
> *kWr.sno- 'black' and
> *persnah2 (~ *pe:rsni-) 'heel' are well-known
> examples of wide-ranging
> words in which the clusters occurs (not to mention
> *tr.snah2 itself or
> more complex structures like *-rh2sn-).
> > Abstract changes based on mental classificationIt's a possible change, not a very likely one. As I
> are
> > at least as important as those based on perceptual
> > phonology.
>
> Fine on paper, as I said, but where are all those tu
> > pi changes that
> should have happened?
> If you insist on theDissim. and met. are more likely to change nasals in
> importance of the dental
> environment, let's imagine something comparable,
> like rstu > rspi. My
> gut feeling as a phonologist is that there is
> something fundamentally
> wrong with any model that predicts this as a
> plausible sound change.