From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 48613
Date: 2007-05-16
> Ahem. You have made your derivation more parsimonious by dodging yourBut if *kWénkWe is accepted for common Italo-Celtic (whether a true
> own argument from pompe < *kWonkWe < *kWenkWe < *penkWe, which is
> therefore also a three-step process.
> But you're right about the (traditional) lack of *p in Proto-Celtic.OK, but this means abandoning the idea of *pémpe as a late IE (but
> So I'll propse a scenario like this:
>
> I Some IE people lives next to a people who can't say kW but
> substitutes p for it.
> II That people takes a piece of the p-people's land and get new slaves
> and girlfriends etc., who learn the new language, but say p.
> III Status: The High people are so disgusted with all these p's that
> they drop all p's. They also *kWe- > *kWo-. Now everyone in the
> conquered territory speaks q-Celtic.
> IV That new people takes the rest of the p-people's land and etc etc.
> V Status: The Low people in the newly conquered land say p for kW, but
> the High people are getting so used to it they say p too. Now everyone
> in the new conquered territory speaks p-Celtic.