From: tgpedersen
Message: 48610
Date: 2007-05-16
>allomorphs:
> On 2007-05-16 11:02, tgpedersen wrote:
>
> > This could instead be explained chronologically as sets of
> >Ahem. You have made your derivation more parsimonious by dodging your
> > *penkWe ->
> > *penkWe/*pempe (kW -> p allomorph) ->
> > *kWenKwe/*pempe (p- -> kW by shibboleth reaction) ->
> > *kWonkWe/*pempe (kWe- -> kWo) ->
> > *kWenkWe/*kWonkWe/*pempe/*pompe by analogy (loss of shibboleth
> > action?)
>
> But P-Celtic *pempe can ONLY come from PCelt. *kWenkWe, as PCelt.
> had no *p. It _can't_ continue pre-Celt. *pempe. If such a
> "dialectal PIE" variant existed at all, it has left no traces in
> Celtic! You propose a zigzag derivation (in effect, *PIE penkWe >
> *pempe > PCelt. *kWenkWe > *pempe) to bypass the PCelt. anti-p
> filter, but that's less parsimonious than the straightforward change
> of *penkWe > *PCelt. *kWenkWe > GBrit. *pempe.