Re: [tied] Re: Lexicon of Proto-Indo-European morphological roots

On Sun, 01 Apr 2007 01:35:20 +0200, Piotr Gasiorowski
<gpiotr@...> wrote:

>I have been vaguely aware of the *dHug[h2]tr- reduction, but I haven't
>read Hackstein's article and don't know whwt evidence is cited there.

Me neither. I can't see what it is based on, at least for
the "daughter"-word. True, Avestan has both dug&dar- (old)
and duGDar- (young), but what does that prove about PIE?

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
miguelc@...