Re: Possessive Enclitics and Oblique Pronouns

From: Jens ElmegÄrd Rasmussen
Message: 48089
Date: 2007-03-26

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "C. Darwin Goranson"
<cdog_squirrel@...> wrote:

> You said that Katz suggested *uswe as the 2nd person plural, instead
of
> *usme. Could the *w have been added due to a confusion with the
> reflexive pronoun *swe?
>

I still don't see your point, especially since I wrote that I believe
that "*uswe" is not correct. Why would I then have an opinion about
its genesis? And what do you mean when you speak about *w being added?
Added to what - to a form **use ?

Jens

Previous in thread: 48086
Next in thread: 48091
Previous message: 48088
Next message: 48090

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts