Re: [tied] Some accentological thoughts...

On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:35:12 +0100, Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
<miguelc@...> wrote:

>At the moment, I have no explanation for the pattern
><esétrU>, G. <esetrá> and <z^ivótU>, G. <z^ivotá>.

I wasn't thinking. -ot- is a dominant suffix (cf. f.
temn-otá, temn-otóN). I'll think about sturgeons after I get
some sleep...

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
miguelc@...