From: Sean Whalen
Message: 47471
Date: 2007-02-15
> >> No, no, no...your etymologies are all completelyIf it meant "light-bearing" that would be fine. The
> >> wrong!
> >
> > What are the alternatives you advocate?
>
> You originally wrote:
>
> > *leukYús > *leukWúz. > louber
>
> OW louber, MoW lleufer is a compound of lleu "light"
> (from either
> Proto-Celtic *lug- or *louo-) + ber "carry" (PrC
> *bero- from PIE
> *bher- "carry").
> > *gWòvus > *bó:uz. > buarWhat suffixed form would that be? What's the ev.
>
> McBain explains Old Irish búar as coming from from
> Proto-Irish *bou-
> [a]r-os, a suffixed form of *boua: "cow".
> > *ghdó:m > *du:(z.) > *domuz. > *dowarThese seem less than convincing when a perfectly
> > *ghdóm+ > *dom+
> [snip]
> > Breton douar, Welsh daear 'earth'
>
> Jens Rasmussen (Miscellaneous morphological problems
> in Indo-European
> languages V, CWPL 2, p. 98) suggests W. daear/Br.
> douar come from PIE
> *dems-(h1)eg'her@2 "the borders of the dwelling",
> while Holger
> Pedersen (Vergleichende Grammatik der keltischen
> Sprachen I-II, 1909-
> 1913) suggests PIE di- + H1eg'her.