From: mkelkar2003
Message: 47407
Date: 2007-02-11
>You first need to make up your mind which theory you support. It the
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "mkelkar2003" <swatimkelkar@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > The horsemen in Europe are there in the
> > > > > archaeological record, general death and destruction.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Death and destruction? Please do not tell me we are back to the
> > > > barberic nomadic Aryan hordes destroying the dark skinned
> > > > inhabitants of the "Indus" valley civilzation aka the Aryan
> > > > Invasion Theory. Your Sankritist colleagues over on
> > > > Indo-Eurasian have done every thing possible to deny that they
> > > > support such violent conquest. Now they are talking about
> > > > Indo-Aryan peaceful migrations or trickle ins.
> > >
> > > I repeat:
> > > The horsemen in Europe are there in the archaeological record,
> > > general death and destruction.
> > >
> > > Now try to read it properly this time.
> > >
> > >
> > > Torsten
> >
> > So these violent horsemen of Europe brought the "Indo-Aryan"
> > languges riding chariots to South Asia. " Aka the blond aryan
> > superman butchering the dark skineed dasas of the Rig Veda.
>
> No, that was the British invasion. Apparently that image is stuck in
> your head for some reason. And you still got it wrong, and in the same
> way as last time. Therefore
>
> I repeat:
> The horsemen in Europe are there in the archaeological record,
> general death and destruction.
>
> Now try to read it properly this time.
>
>
> Torsten
>