Re: [tied] Slavic *sUto -> is NOT INHERIT

On 2007-02-08 10:37, Piotr Gasiorowski wrote:

> On 2007-02-08 09:18, Sean Whalen wrote:

>> Since *-um > *-uw > *-u > -U in Slavic
>> (the lack of nasalization is the important
>> part) it's completely possible that *um >
>> U in other environments (not before b/p
>> but before t, apparently).
>
> As in...?

PS And why *um, if we normally expect *im in such a context (note Lith.
s^imtas)?