Re: [tied] Something about Lachmann

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...> wrote:

> Note, too, the complex change of *-sr- >
> *-zr- > *-Dr- > *-Br- > -br-, hard to explain without assuming *-D-

at

> one point. Word initially, we have *sr- > *Tr- > fr- (no voicing).

Wouldn't you rather wait with the voicing, making the chain of events
*-sr- > *-Tr- > *-fr- > *-Br- > -br-? I think this makes it closer to
the word-initial changes.

Jens