From: C. Darwin Goranson
Message: 47213
Date: 2007-02-02
--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Richard Wordingham" <richard@>
wrote:
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@> wrote:
> >
> > > Or rather, the PIE root was really *NgWou, *NgWu- and the
> > > tradtional PIE phonemes b, d, g^, g, gW are not glottalized as
G/I
> > > want, but prenasalized: Mb, Nd, Ng^, N,g, N,gW.
> >
> > Glottalised is rather a vague term. In the preglottalised series
> > it's the back consonant which is most likely to be omitted, as
> > opposed to the ejective series, where it's the labial that is
most
> > likely to be missing. In a prenasalised series, it's the labial
> > that's most likely to be missing.
>
> Some say the missing PIE b should be sought in the abundance of PIE
> w's. If voiced stops were prenasalized, that consonant which is Nb
in
> the system would be in reality a Nw or mW, which is nice, since we
> already need a consonant which could morph into m and w at the right
> places, ie 1pl, -ment-/-went- etc.
>
> BTW:
> Let's pretend voiced stops were prenasalized (*Nb, *Nd, *Ng^, *Ng,
> *NgW), and that they became nasal + stop if initial in the stressed
> syllable (ie *-NDV´- -> *-N-DV´-; the second hyphen is purely
formal,
> caused by the fact that nasal vowels are written *VN and nasals
*N).
>
> Imagine a PIE root *eNb-.
> 3sg *eNb-ti -> *e:pti
> 3pl *Nb-énti -> *mW-énti
> ppp *Nb-tó- -> *m.p-tó-
>
> from that one might construct
> Latin
> pres. em-
>
> Hittite
> 3sg e:pzi
> 3pl appanzi
> Latin aptus (with analogous vowel)
>
> Latin
> e:mptus
>
> etc
>
> And the semantics is nice too: acquire, ergreifen etc.
>
> One entry less in LIV!
>
>
> Torsten
>