Re: [tied] Compound Verbs using the root h1euk-?

...and finally to consider the EARLY-PIE as a pure analytical
language :)


--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3" <alexandru_mg3@...>
wrote:

>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@> wrote:
> >
> > On 2006-10-25 23:51, alexandru_mg3 wrote:
> >
> > > Do we have verbal compounds:
> > >
> > > <new-verb> = <verbal-root-1> + <verbal-root-2>
> > >
> > > that used the root h1euk- 'to accustom oneself, be used to'?
> >
> > I don't know of any VV compounds in PIE. Why are you asking?
> >
> > Piotr
> >
>
> I suspected that the origin of the PIE adjectives formed with the

PIE

> sufix -uko have appeared from older PIE verbal constructions maybe
> initially 2 distinct words) based on *h1euk- and I'm trying to find

a

> trace of such verbal compounds
>
> Same pattern can be applied to different other adjectival&noun
> suffixes (see -dH- formations where the original verbal root 'to

set,

> to place, to keep' is very visible too)
>
> We clearly have here verbal compounds that preceeded the formation

of

> the related adjectives based on the suffixes originated from that
> verbal roots
>
> So please to try to find VV traces too...because is the missing

link

> here
>
> Marius
>
> P.S. and to go to my final ideea:
> ...maybe finally, I mean initially (not in PIE, of course, but
> Earlier) we didn't have adjectives AT ALL...we have had only nouns

&

> verbs (and some verbal constructions used to describe different
> properties) and seems that the PIE structure is not so faraway from
> that initial situation
>
> Based on 'this extremism', we will be also obliged, as a logical
> deduction to derived finally each PIE suffix from a PIE root ...
>