From: tgpedersen
Message: 46410
Date: 2006-10-18
>It sounds tempting, but, sad to say, I have no proposals there (and
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Perhaps I missed something, was there a specific remark or
> conclusion
> > > you are referring to?
> > >
> >
> > Well, yes, the idea of the two first brothers sharing the
> > inheritance such that the oldest gets the immobile property
> > (*leikW-), and the second gets the mobile property (*orbh-).
> > That would mean that the dichotomy between immobile and mobile
> > property is old in IE jurisprudence. That's also why I want to
> > understand *gWih3w- "live", which Piotr has shown is related to
> > *gWow- "cow, cattle", as "moving around", ie "mobile".
> >
> > Torsten
>
> Ok, that is pretty cool.
> The first born Leib-prinz, second born Erb-prinz, and prince
> charming; is an interesting theory.
>
> Now if you can give me an equally intriguing (or better) etymology
> to the Germanic brother known as Istaev/Istio/Iscio/Hiscion - I'll
> try to get my wife to bake you some cookies?!
>
> Yes, I will resort to petty bribery.