From: Daniel J. Milton
Message: 46390
Date: 2006-10-17
>word
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Daniel J. Milton" <dmilt1896@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Carl Hult <datalampa@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Try is one of my favourite words and a mysterious one. According to
> > > www.etymonline.com try is a french word:
> > >
> > > c.1300, "examine judiciously, sit in judgment of," from Anglo-Fr.
> trier
> > > (c.1290), from O.Fr. trier "to pick out, cull" (12c.), from
> > > Gallo-Romance *triare, of unknown origin.
> > >
> > > http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=try
> > >
> > > I don´t doubt any of this but isn´t there any knowledge of this
> > > before the 13th century?*******
> > >
> > > /Carl Hult
> > ******
> > Buck's "Synonyms":
> > ME 'trie', NE 'try', in earliest use "separate the good", "sift",
> > etc. (as still in "try out fat") fr. OFR 'trier' "separate", this
> > prob., (despite Prov. 'triar') fr. VLat '*tritare' (It 'tritare' "rub
> > down, puverize, cut into small pieces", formerly also "thresh grain"),
> > this fr. Lat 'terere', pple. 'tritus' "rub" and also "thresh".
> >
> > Seems reasonable.
> > Dan
> >
>
> E. Klein's 1967 "Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English
> Language" rejects this (actually offering nothing instead):
>
> ME. trien, 'to select', fr. AF. trier, fr. OF. (= F.) trier, 'to set
> apart, select', a word of doubtful origin. Its derivation fr. VL.
> *tri:ta:re, 'to rub down', freq. of terere, 'to rub, thresh, grind' - as
> suggested by most philologists - must be rejected not only because of
> the great difference in meaning between L. terere and F. trier but
> also because of phonetic reasons (VL. *tri:ta:re could not have become
> triar in OProvenç.)
>
> It would also probably be useful to check what French etymological
> dictionaries say. Anybody has one? :)
>
> Marek