From: A.
Message: 46388
Date: 2006-10-16
>conclusion
>
> > Perhaps I missed something, was there a specific remark or
> > you are referring to?Ok, that is pretty cool.
> >
>
> Well, yes, the idea of the two first brothers sharing the
> inheritance such that the oldest gets the immobile property
> (*leikW-), and the second gets the mobile property (*orbh-).
> That would mean that the dichotomy between immobile and mobile
> property is old in IE jurisprudence. That's also why I want to
> understand *gWih3w- "live", which Piotr has shown is related to
> *gWow- "cow, cattle", as "moving around", ie "mobile".
>
> Torsten