Re: [tied] Re: Slavic endings

On 2006-09-09 19:35, Jens Elmegård Rasmussen wrote:

> But you *have* whetted our appetite, and you can spare us a whole lot
> of searching if you would be kind enough to paraphrase the main point
> of your theory here. Is it graphic?

Seconded. Analogical influence of *-jo- stems was the main idea, wasn't
it? As for the "vocative theory", the absence of the first
palatalisation of final velars before the nom.sg. -e is another
important counterargument.

Piotr