Re: [tied] Re: Slavic *-je/o

On 2006-09-05 18:22, Sergejus Tarasovas wrote:

> (Indeed, if you and Jakobson were
> right, there would be eg. no pre-Dybo (b)-words with pretonic acutes,
> but eg. any a-stem (b)-noun is like that).

The wording above is a bit condensed and I'm not quite sure I see what
you mean. With pretonic acutes _at what stage_? Before Dybo's Law,
(b)-stressed nouns were generally stem-stressed, weren't they? Could you
provide an example or two?

Piotr