Re: [tied] Re: Germanic strong verbs class VI

On 2006-08-16 10:49, tgpedersen wrote:

> Check this out:
> www.angelfire.com/rant/tgpedersen/tw.html
> I suspect it's a loan.
> Kortlandt fails to answer why
> 1) it violates IE root constraints

His reconstruction is *t(e)h2g-, which doesn't violate any root constraints.

> 2) how it sneaked itself into class VI

He does answer that (pp. 62-63). One may disagree with his explanation,
but he certainly doesn't _fail_ to address question 2.

Piotr