From: mcvwxsnl
Message: 45709
Date: 2006-08-14
> What you say makes sense and sounds right. But there is a smallThe raising applies only before a final nasal (-m or -n) or a
> question which I have with the pronominal-import theory: if *-os
> and *-om of the masc. nom. and acc. sg. should become *-U
> (unstressed *o before consonants), why would *o remain /o/ before
> *d -- why wouldn't it also become *-U?
> I can understand that a following nasal might raise /o/ to /u/, butLikely the raising applied when final -s and -s^ had already become -
> why should following *-s raise /o/ to /u/?
> If you say that theAs I said, many neuters (those not having end-stress) did just that
> masculines developed *-U entirely from the accusative singular,
> whereas the masculine nominative singular *-os would have produced
> *-o like *-od, then why didn't neuters also develop *-U, and simply
> merge with the masculines like *medU did?
> Perhaps it has to doThe facts about the stress are the following:
> with *-od possibly being stressed, and *-os being unstressed, for
> the divergent vowel development (although wasn't *-os sometimes
> stressed as well?). Or is stressed vs. unstressed *-om another
> possible source for the distinction between *-U and *-o?