From: tgpedersen
Message: 45182
Date: 2006-06-30
> > Never heard of that. If so, why Latin <libet>,Hans Kuhn (again), who would like to place the pre-Romans and pre-
> > older <lubet>, "pleases", related to OE <lufu>
> > "love"? And if *u>i there in Germanic, then one
> > would not find <lufu> nor <lof> "praise" nor OE
> > <lybb> "drug" (OHG <luppi>) related to Irish <luibh>
> > "herb".
>
> Depending on the time the rule occurs PIE *bh could
> have been *f in Latin; with dissimilation of *oi>ei;
> *eu>ei; *u>i later (if *lub>*lab fits in with *wr.()w
> > *ar()w it's probably fairly old).
>