Re: [tied] A loose thought on present n-infix, ablaut

On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 15:05:11 +0000, tgpedersen
<tgpedersen@...> wrote:

>Now, I have a vague recollection that Miguel did something similar
>here on cybalist with a's and aN's recently, which impressed me much
>but I didn't understand half of, and a nagging doubt that it was
>something similar to the above, but I can't find a reference.

It wasn't anything similar. I'm not sure what you're
referring to, perhaps something I said about the alternation
*gWem- ~ *gWah2- and similar ones. If I remember correctly,
I tried to explain it as **gWamh2-V- (syllabificatioon
*gWa-mh2a-) > *gWem- versus **gWa:mh2-C- > **gwãh2-C- >
*gWah2- (with etymological /a/, not /e/, before *h2).

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...