From: mkelkar2003
Message: 44989
Date: 2006-06-15
>Conventional wisdom has it that PIE speakers came from landlocked
> In all the treaties and discussion I have seen about the early IE
> migrations, the Black Sea is concidered as a hinderance or even a
> fence for the migration. The question of how the IE tribes got
> around to Anatolia (or the other way) allways pop up. In the same
> way the Caspian sea is considered a fence for the migration eastward
> that had to be circumvented.
>
> I think tink is a wrong way of thinking. It is higly probable that
> the IE tribes around the Anube delta or in Anatolia could use boats,
> and effectively migrate across these seas or at least along the
> shores, and probably great groups of IE people could migrate
> simultanously at these seas. The Norwegian explorer Thor Heyerdahl
> did show that it is possible to even migrate across the Atlantic
> Ocean and the Pacific in simple fleets, and that the Sea in fact
> made long distance migration easier.
>
> Then the Black sea or Caspian Sea would not be any problem for
> migration. On the contrary, they would facilate the migration, and
> make mass migration, colonization and trading easier.
>
> I therefore think the migation to or from Anatolia, and the
> migration down to Greece likely occured by boat and most likely
> streightacross the sea.
>
> If migration by boat is considered as the most likely form of
> migration in this area, I think it will be easier to establish a
> theory about a migration pattern that explaines the structural
> groupings of the IE languages.
>