Re: [tied] trzymac'

On Uto, svibanj 30, 2006 1:36 am, Miguel Carrasquer reče:

> On Mon, 29 May 2006 18:57:53 +0000, Sergejus Tarasovas
> <S.Tarasovas@...> wrote:
>
>>--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:
>>
>>> Nonsense, it's t(vI)ri:má:joN, which should have shortened
>>> the /i:/ if it was pretonic.
>>
>>But it hasn't (Slovincian -î-).
>
> Then it wasn't pretonic, or the length is analogical after
> forms in wich the i: was stressed and long (neo-acute).

Again, if 2 & 3 person singular & plural have a long vowel, and 1 persons
sg&pl don't, an analogy is to be expected. Especially when other
conjugations types have a long vowel in all the persons regularly.

Mate