From: Abdullah Konushevci
Message: 44425
Date: 2006-04-27
>from
> Alb. <qengj> m, pl. <qengja> `lamb' is supposed to be borrowed
> the methetic from of *acing(u)lus <Lat agniculus (Skok). Buggethinks
> that it is from Rom *agnunc(u)lus, Meyer fellows Bugge. Camaj sawin
> it as prefixcal derivative of q- and further comparison with<enjë>.
> Çabej connects it qengj< *ken-k- to Gk kainos `new') etc.that
> Because the name of <lamb> appears in Gheg as <kingj> (cf. kepë,
> besides Tosk <qepë> from probably Latin caepa `onion'), I guess
> in the case of Alb. <king/qingj> we have to deal with laryngealPAlb
> hardening (*H2 > /k/), deriving it from *H2egWh-nu- that yields
> *kenj-u > kingj/qingj with analogy leveling of cluster *gWh-n to<nj>,
> like in *g'ne:-sko > njoh `to know', *egni-/*ogni- `fire' > Alb.jagne: OE
> <enj>, probably from *ogni-, attested in <e enjte> `Thursday' and
> with /i/ vocalism due to i-Umlaut: Gk amnos: Lat. agnus: OCS
> e:anian `yean'. (Pokorny agwh-no-s 9.)This hardening of laryngeal seems to appear as well in *ost-, from
>
> Konushevci